THE WATER QUESTION
The water debate now has numbers.
Enid has just finished a water investment that took years to plan and hundreds of millions of dollars to build. The completed Kaw Lake Water Supply Program includes a raw-water intake, roughly 70 miles of pipeline and a 10.5-million-gallon-per-day treatment plant.[1][5]
At the Sept. 15 study session, City staff put the Kaw program’s total budget at $344,716,345.41. A City loan table showed $334,104,335.13 in original Kaw-related loans and $296,540,758.62 in principal still outstanding as of Aug. 1.[3][6]
Thunderbird’s developers say the project would become a major anchor customer on that system.[2]
At full buildout, Thunderbird says the four campuses and power plant would consume about 562 million gallons a year — an average of about 1.54 million gallons a day. The project estimates demand could reach 7.3 million gallons on the hottest summer day. Developers say they plan a relatively steady 2 million gallons per day raw-Kaw draw and roughly 31.8 million gallons of on-site storage to cover peaks.[2]
Thunderbird describes these as current engineering estimates, not permit limits, and says detailed calculations are not yet final. [2]
The City has not adopted those figures as an approved allocation. Its project page says any raw-water use remains subject to available supply, infrastructure capacity, contracts, permits and applicable approvals.[4]
So the question is no longer simply how much water Thunderbird says it needs. There is now a proposed answer. The harder question is whether Enid can reliably supply it while preserving the capacity the community will need in the future.
A 10.5-MGD treatment-plant rating is not a measure of spare raw-Kaw capacity for Thunderbird. The proposed data center would use raw water upstream of the drinking-water treatment process, and Enid has existing demand, regional customers and future-growth needs. That is why the formal capacity analysis, drought rules and water agreement matter.
Thunderbird says the computer campuses would use closed-loop cooling and the power plant would rely primarily on air cooling, with most consumptive loss during hot-weather turbine operation.[2] The design may reduce water use compared with some other cooling arrangements, but raw water remains part of the resource Enid spent hundreds of millions developing.
The next records that matter are the capacity study, the water contract, the drought provisions and the enforceable maximum withdrawal.